Infants

To best evaluate your baby, it is beneficial to understand age-appropriate infant development first.

Below I have listed qualities observed in infants who were later identified as gifted.  While these are noteworthy commonalities, most gifted infants will not show all of these qualities.

Common qualities among gifted infants:

  • Stays awake longer. A typical newborn–three month baby sleeps 14+ hours each day.  A typical three-nine month baby sleeps 12+ hours each day and usually sleeps for long stretches each night.
  • Demands more attention and diversion than other infants.
  • Reacts strongly to stimuli by showing strong emotion.
  • Shows evidence of remembering things, such as he may start a game of peek-a-boo.
  • Shows intense curiosity and often express frustration when unable to engage curiosities.
  • Early evidence of recognition of language with increasing complexity.
  • Often speaks early.
  • Easily frustrated because of advanced cognitive development that enables an increasingly complex understanding of the world around the infant, yet she possesses age appropriate or lagging development in other areas  that prohibits communication and/or participation in her world.

Imagine if you were in a very important business meeting, where you are the expert, but you are unable to communicate or participate…  This may be similar to what the gifted infant is experiencing.

For more information:

Silverman, L. K. (1991). Resources for parents with gifted children. Child Development Institute. Office of Education, Research and Improvement.

J. Jolly, D. Treffinger, T. Ford Inman, and J. Franklin Smutny.  (Eds.)  2011. Parenting gifted children: the authorized guide from the national association of gifted children.  Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.

2 Comments to “Infants”

  1. Disclaimer: I do not have children. I am very ciruous myself to hear what parents with children will think of this book. I got this book because I teach college, and in the last two years it seems that the students have really changed stuff that used to work no longer does. I’m looking for answers. For example, this book discusses why adolescents lie a problem I’ve run into many times. *Part* of their argument (I don’t mean to oversimplify their point) is that teenagers have learned that a)telling the truth will get them in trouble b) getting away with lying saves both them and their parents from aggravation and c) there’s really no worse penalty for getting caught for doing X *and* lying about it than there is for doing X thus there’s no harm in trying, at least, the lie. This makes absolute sense with the scenarios I see semester to semester. Now that I know where it’s coming from, I can consider better how to manage it as in, make clear that the penalty for lying in this class will be much worse than just getting a zero on the paper. This book has also, though it wasn’t a main point of the book, reinforced to me something I’ve felt for a long time: that education should shape the whole person, beyond academics. Schools are were young people spend most of their time and have most of their social interactions it makes perfect sense that schools should also get involved in teaching good human being’ skills. The surprise in this book comes from the fact that all of our old notions of how to create good human beings are apparently completely unsupported by science. We think praise is good turns out indiscriminate praise can actually cause students to underperform! We think arguments are all bad turns out they’re not! We think violent TV programs are the ones we want to shield our kids from turns out that more schoolyard cruelty came from groups who watched safe’ cartoons like Arthur. What I appreciated was that this book didn’t (to me, at least) take an alarmist tone stop that, you’re ruining your child!!! Instead it shows the assumptions, challenges them, brings in science and then goes on to humanize the results Bronson’s little discussions with his son in the race chapter were insightful and awfully cute, and really drove the points home. His open discomfort with the praise issue hit all the points I’d imagine I’d go through in praise withdrawal.’ One thing I wanted, simply, was more! More science! They kept the science parts as short and general-readership-friendly as they could, which is a great choice to sell books that will reach the largest audience, but me, I wanted more than little blurbs of studies. Not that I wasn’t convinced, but I wanted to see a bit more for myself. I am planning on passing this book on to my friends (especially those with young children) and having some really great discussions about it. This would be a great pick for a bookclub or discussion group.

    • I’m also writing to make you know what a great dscoivery my cousin’s princess encountered visiting your webblog. She even learned a wide variety of things, most notably how it is like to have an incredible helping spirit to make certain people without hassle thoroughly grasp selected complex topics. You really did more than readers’ desires. Many thanks for producing such precious, healthy, edifying and in addition cool tips about that topic to Mary.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: